Results: Searches identified 2,675 publications describing the effects of male circumcision on aspects of male sexual function, sensitivity, sensation, or satisfaction. Of these, 36 met our inclusion criteria of containing original data. Those studies reported a total of 40,473 men, including 19,542 uncircumcised and 20,931 circumcised. Rated by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network grading system, 2 were 1++ (high quality randomized controlled trials) and 34 were case-control or cohort studies (11 high quality: 2++; 10 well-conducted: 2+; 13 low quality: 2-). The 1++, 2++, and 2+ studies uniformly found that circumcision had no overall adverse effect on penile sensitivity, sexual arousal, sexual sensation, erectile function, premature ejaculation, ejaculatory latency, orgasm difficulties, sexual satisfaction, pleasure, or pain during penetration. Support for these conclusions was provided by a meta-analysis. Impairment in one or more parameters was reported in 10 of the 13 studies rated as 2-. These lower-quality studies contained flaws in study design (11), selection of cases and/or controls (5), statistical analysis (4), and/or data interpretation (6); five had multiple problems.
چرا برعکسشو نمیگی اگه بزرگ شد و ناراضی بود آیا دیگه راه برگشتی هست اینهمه عمل سنگین مردم انجام میدن از عمل بینی که سخت تر نیست بعدشم باید از دکتر خجالت نکشه این واسه ادم های بی اعتماد به نفسه من که با بچه خودم دشمنی ندارم میخام بهترین تصمیم رو براش بگیرم
مال آکسفورد
Results
Searches identified 46 publications containing original data, as well as 4 systematic reviews (2 with meta-analyses), plus 29 critiques of various studies and 15 author replies, which together comprised a total of 94 publications. There was overall consistency in conclusions arising from high- and moderate-quality survey data in randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, physiological studies, large longitudinal studies, and cohort studies in diverse populations. Those studies found MC has no or minimal adverse effect on sexual function, sensation, or pleasure, with some finding improvements. A consensus from physiological and histological studies was that the glans and underside of the shaft, not the foreskin, are involved in neurological pathways mediating erogenous sensation. In contrast to the higher quality evidence, data supporting adverse effects of MC on function, sensation, or pleasure were found to be of low quality, as explained in critiques of those studies.
ارسال نظر شما
این تاپیک قفل شده است و ثبت پست جدید در آن امکان پذیر نیست
جدیدترین تاپیک های 2 روز گذشته
تاپیک های به روز شده
39 ثانیه پیش
45 ثانیه پیش
پربازدیدترین تاپیک های امروز
داغ ترین های تاپیک های 2 روز گذشته
داغ ترین های تاپیک های امروز